(The text below is reprinted from the news release by STRS on 01/18/2013.)
2012
Member Survey Results Presented
Results of membership surveys conducted in December 2012 show that more
than 90% of STRS Ohio members continue to have positive
overall impressions of STRS Ohio and most still consider their pension an excellent or good
value.
These were just a sample of the findings from the annual membership
surveys presented by Dr. Marty Saperstein at the board's January 2013
meeting. Dr. Saperstein's Columbus-based research firm, Saperstein Associates,
conducted interviews with 602 randomly selected participants (301 active
members and 301 retirees). The surveys averaged about 15 minutes in length.
This year's results also showed the following:
· About half of the active members surveyed indicated they plan
to teach longer than they originally thought, and the most common reason cited
for this was pension reform legislation.
· A majority of active and retired members have positive
overall impressions of the Retirement Board.
· Compared with last year, more retirees feel the pension
system is financially sound, but fewer actives feel that way.
· Most members are satisfied with system communications,
including email updates. More than half of retirees and two out of three active
members have visited the STRS Ohio website.
· 95% of the retiree households have at least one source of
income in addition to STRS Ohio. On average, STRS Ohio provides 58% of
retirees' income.
Retirements Approved.
The Retirement Board approved 183 active members and 340 inactive
members for service retirement benefits.
Other STRS Ohio News
STRS Ohio Meets with Constituents
to Discuss Defined Contribution and Alternative Retirement Plan Mitigating Rate
At STRS Ohio's request, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) completed a study
of the portion of employer contributions necessary to mitigate negative
financial impact from offering a defined contribution plan (based on Section
3307.84, Revised Code). This calculation is called the "mitigating
rate." Using three different approaches, PwC has recommended a mitigating
rate range from 4.85% to 12.57% for the 2013–14 fiscal year. Separately, the
Ohio Retirement Study Council has asked its actuarial consultant, Milliman, to
calculate the mitigating rate for alternative retirement plan participants.
In December and January, STRS Ohio staff met with the Healthcare and
Pension Advocates for STRS (HPA) and the Inter-University Council of Ohio's
(IUC) Human Resources Committee to talk about the mitigating rate and its
impact on the retirement system's unfunded liability. The groups recognized
that STRS Ohio has to reduce the unfunded liability, but the IUC committee
requested more information. Staff will continue discussions with these groups.
Enrollment Remains Essentially
Unchanged in STRS Ohio Health Care Plans
Following a successful open-enrollment period in November, the STRS Ohio
Health Care Program started the new year with essentially the same enrollment
levels as before open enrollment. More than 8,300 plan changes were recorded
between December 2012 and January 2013. Total enrollment in the STRS Ohio
Health Care Program as of Jan 1, 2013, stands at 125,418. The largest number of
plan participants are enrolled in the Aetna Medicare PPO (and ESA PPO) plans,
with a total of 76,545 enrollees.
Call Center Surveys Reflect High
Satisfaction Ratings
Nearly 9,000 callers to the Member Services Center during the first half
of the fiscal year chose to remain on the phone and complete a satisfaction
survey. More than 96% of the respondents stated they were satisfied or better
with their experience, while 82% stated they were extremely pleased with the
service. Call volume is up about 5% for the first six months of the fiscal year
compared to last year. The average wait time for the preceding 12-month period
decreased to 20 seconds compared to 29 seconds last December.
STRS Ohio Receives Actuarial
Consulting Proposals
Seven firms, including PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), have submitted
proposals to provide actuarial consulting services when the current contract
with PwC expires in March. Staff anticipates that finalists will make
presentations to the board at the time of its March meeting.