Skip to main content

STRS Ohio Presents Pension Reform Proposal to House Subcommittee

(FROM the STRS Ohio eUPDATE)

On Aug. 8, STRS Ohio executive director Mike Nehf told members of the House Health and Aging Subcommittee on Retirement and Pensions that the pension reform plan unanimously passed by the State Teachers Retirement Board in April is necessary to preserve the pension fund and that the board's action was taken to uphold its fiduciary duty to the members and retirees of the system. The House subcommittee has been holding hearings on pension legislation since mid-July and expects to take action on bills for all five Ohio retirement systems in September. 

Mr. Nehf's presentation acknowledged that STRS Ohio's pension proposal is supported by the Healthcare and Pension Advocates for STRS — a coalition that is comprised of groups of active members, retirees and employers. The STRS Ohio plan increases age and service requirements for retirement; calculates pensions on a lower, fixed formula; increases the period for determining final average salary; increases member contributions to the system; reduces the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA); defers the COLA for future retirees; and calls for no COLA to be added in fiscal year 2014.

The Ohio Senate passed pension reform bills in May, but the House chose to wait for the results of an independent study — commissioned by the Ohio Retirement Study Council (ORSC) — of the retirement systems' pension plan design changes. That report was presented to the ORSC on July 11 and recommended the adoption of the systems' plans. Mr. Nehf referred to the study in his remarks to the House subcommittee, noting that the report stated, "Although (STRS Ohio's) proposed 30-year plan does not quite satisfy the objectives of fully funding the unfunded actuarial liability over no longer than 30 years initially, health care benefits are expected to remain solvent indefinitely and the retirement system is projected to meet the 30-year requirement by 2016 and be 100% funded by 2041." 

Earlier in the hearing, Senate President Tom Niehaus (R-New Richmond) testified on behalf of himself and his legislative co-sponsor, Minority Leader Eric Kearney (D-Cincinnati) in support of the bills, saying, "I am proud that all five bills passed the Senate with overwhelming bipartisan support." Niehaus also recognized that the changes contained in the pension reform plans are not popular, but necessary. "I applaud the members of these plans for recognizing the economic necessity of accepting difficult choices in order to preserve their pensions and the opportunity to receive health care benefits," said Niehaus. 

Following his presentation, Mr. Nehf and senior members of his staff responded to several questions from subcommittee members that covered a wide range of topics, including investment strategies, comparisons between the current reform plan versus earlier proposals and the impact that the federal health care laws will have on the system's health care plan. 

Additional hearings are scheduled in August and early September. STRS Ohio will continue to use its website, newsletters and eUPDATE email news service to keep members and stakeholders informed about the progress of pension reform legislation.

Popular posts from this blog

October Board News

The text below is reprinted from the news release by STRS on 10/18/2013. You'll note the pension funding ratio improved to 66% but is still well below where it needs to be even after strong recent market returns and pension changes. Teachers don't be surprised if additional future changes in the form of benefit reductions of some form are required.  --- Annual Actuarial Valuation Shows Improvement in STRS Ohio Funding; Consultant Provides Guidance on Funding Policy   At its October meeting, the State Teachers Retirement Board received a report of the annual pension valuation results from its actuarial consultant, Segal Consulting. The report provides a “snapshot” of the actuarial position of the retirement fund as of July 1, 2013. This is the first valuation completed using the new benefit structure resulting from the passage of pension reform legislation last fall. Segal’s report this year shows the funding period for the pension fund decrea...

Comments on Proposed Changes to State Teacher's Retirement System

As seen from the full post of the STRS announcement , STRS finally came out with their proposed changes to the pension plan. These changes will be presented to the Ohio Retirement Study Council next week in conjunction with the other state pension systems for public employees. These other state pension systems face similar issues as STRS and change within these other pension systems is likely not far behind. It's important to note that state law must actually be changed before these proposed changes can actually be put into force, so there is still considerable length to this process of change. Change in some form is eminent. Private, non-government pension systems have been vanishing over the last decades because in part because as our life expectancy has continually increased over time, the pensions have had to be paid longer than expected. Pensions put an open-ended liability on the shoulders of the private companies and these pensions and healthcare benefits provided to both e...

STRS Ohio February Board News

Board Reviews Recommendations From Experience Study, Weighs Impact on Financial Condition   At the February meeting of the State Teachers Retirement Board, staff summarized the results of the experience study recently completed by the board’s actuarial consultant, Segal Consulting. An experience study is completed every five years to help the system make accurate economic and demographic assumptions used to measure the financial condition of the pension fund. The economic assumptions include the rates of inflation, salary increases, overall payroll growth and the investment return on assets. Demographic assumptions include the number of retirements, disability inceptions, withdrawals from the system and deaths among active members and benefit recipients. The results of the study showed that STRS Ohio should consider adjustments in several key areas that will have an overall negative impact on the system’s funding status. Segal’s recommendations included: lowering STRS Ohio’s...