Skip to main content

Ohio Attorney General Suing British Petroleum Over Losses to State's Pension Plans

It was announced on July 21st Richard Cordray, Attorney General for the State of Ohio, is jockeying to be the lead attorney in a law suit filed against British Petroleum (BP), seeking class-action status. The law suit was filed on behalf of the state's five pension systems, which incurred substantial losses due to the decline in BP stock after the gulf disaster.

"Institutional investors, and the Ohio Funds in particular, have been greatly harmed by BP's alleged misconduct. By forming a partnership between New York and Ohio, we aim to compensate investors for what we believe was securities fraud and effect real change in the way BP and other companies do business," Cordray said.

Let me first and very clearly state that I am not in any way, shape, or form arguing in defense of BP in writing this. What I am arguing for is common sense and personal responsibility. I'm no expert in deep-see drilling, but it would certainly appear to me that it might be a bit risky drilling down several thousand feet in the middle of an ocean or gulf. I may also think remember past catastrophes like the Exxon Valdez--while not a drilling issue--a dirty disaster nonetheless and one that Exxon and Exxon investors paid dearly for.

If investors didn't know that an oil company had material risks involved in deep sea drilling, they're not too smart. Filing a law suit to recover losses because you're not too smart just doesn't sit well with me. I am a participant in the State Teacher's Retirement System of Ohio and an investor in the stock market, so I too was harmed. I guess the difference is--in my biased opinion--I'm not looking for a handout because of it.

The handouts or amounts for damages should be paid to those who are directly affected by the disaster in the gulf. Writing this from Ohio where virtually no natural disaster occurs, I can only image the impact on the local residents, business owners, rig workers, etc. along the gulf. These people's livelihoods will be harmed for a long time to come and some may be so irreparably. These are the people that need money from BP and not those that made a bad investment in hindsight.

Maybe Cordray is trying to make a name for himself....maybe he's trying to get money for Ohio's woefully underfunded pensions...maybe he is on sound legal basis for doing all this. Regardless, I don't think from a common-sense perspective what he is doing is right, and I'm ashamed to be an Ohioan on this day.

While some or many may not agree with my perspective, it is what it is. I don't believe people can go through life pointing fingers at others when things go wrong. You have to look in the mirror and accept responsibility for your decisions. I can only dream how much better we'd be off if more people had this perspective.

Click here for more information on the story.

Kevin Kroskey, CFP, MBA


Bookmark and Share

Popular posts from this blog

Comments on Proposed Changes to State Teacher's Retirement System

As seen from the full post of the STRS announcement , STRS finally came out with their proposed changes to the pension plan. These changes will be presented to the Ohio Retirement Study Council next week in conjunction with the other state pension systems for public employees. These other state pension systems face similar issues as STRS and change within these other pension systems is likely not far behind. It's important to note that state law must actually be changed before these proposed changes can actually be put into force, so there is still considerable length to this process of change. Change in some form is eminent. Private, non-government pension systems have been vanishing over the last decades because in part because as our life expectancy has continually increased over time, the pensions have had to be paid longer than expected. Pensions put an open-ended liability on the shoulders of the private companies and these pensions and healthcare benefits provided to both e...

October Board News

The text below is reprinted from the news release by STRS on 10/18/2013. You'll note the pension funding ratio improved to 66% but is still well below where it needs to be even after strong recent market returns and pension changes. Teachers don't be surprised if additional future changes in the form of benefit reductions of some form are required.  --- Annual Actuarial Valuation Shows Improvement in STRS Ohio Funding; Consultant Provides Guidance on Funding Policy   At its October meeting, the State Teachers Retirement Board received a report of the annual pension valuation results from its actuarial consultant, Segal Consulting. The report provides a “snapshot” of the actuarial position of the retirement fund as of July 1, 2013. This is the first valuation completed using the new benefit structure resulting from the passage of pension reform legislation last fall. Segal’s report this year shows the funding period for the pension fund decrea...

STRS Ohio December Board News

CliftonLarsonAllen Completes Fiscal 2017 Annual Financial Statement Audit and Issues Clean Opinion At the December meeting of the State Teachers Retirement Board, CliftonLarsonAllen reported the results of its audit of the STRS Ohio financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017. The report showed that the retirement system’s financial statements were fairly stated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that no material weaknesses in internal controls or instances of noncompliance were found. As a result, STRS Ohio received an unmodified opinion — also known as a “clean” opinion — which is the highest level of opinion that an organization can achieve. STRS Ohio’s financial statements are included in the 2017 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report , which will be posted on the system’s website by Dec. 29, 2017. In addition to the financial statements, the report includes investment, actuarial and statistical information about STRS Ohio. This repor...